Last Lines | We the Animals

I’m not sure how I feel about books that hinge on the final few chapters.  I love a poem that hinges on the last line, it makes everything come full circle, feel whole.  It can break you with that final period and stance of white space.  Take for instance this poem by Josh Booton published in Raleigh Review Vol 2.

Josh Booton "Cache" published in Raleigh Review

While that poem is magical and every word deserves a place; every letter, every syllable, every shape of the font hangs on that last line.  And We the Animals by Justin Torres has that element.  I wasn’t sure how to take this book until I got to those last few chapters, waiting for the cliff, waiting for that moment of hysteria that all good books have.

I don’t want to ruin the ending, so.

We the Animals by Justin Torres

I’ll just explain my thoughts on We the Animals.  We the Animals means nothing until page 103.  It’s the story of three brothers who have a dysfunctional, factory working mother who wears steel toed boots with her pink painted toenails.  Their father is more mysterious – he’s tied down by the mother through pregnancy and their marriage is one of deepness, regret, abuse, but also skin and the way their bodies urge together against sinks and through doorways.

The thing that’s really compelling about this marriage is the secret messages between the two.  At one point, the father digs a grave and the mother stands next to it smoking her cigarettes and staring into the haze.  I’m not even sure what was meant by this dug grave and his leaving.  I’m not sure what sign I’m supposed to take from that scene but I like the way the characters keep secrets from the reader; that this is a true relationship and we’re only let in just so, just into the physical and not the mental.

There’s something really honest there that Torres is able to do in a lot of scenes and with a lot of characters – these character to character secrets.  It’s a new form of irony, I suppose.

I think a lot of this book is also the controversial story.  Torres doesn’t give it all away.  While this is a short read, coming in at 125 pages, it is what’s in the white space, the glimmer between each sentence that really stands out to the reader.  It’s as if Torres is standing over each reader saying, what do you think.  What has happened.

Are we okay.

Are we human if this, this, and this, has happened and we are wild-eyed and bulldozing.  I’m not sure how to answer these questions.  How do we name animal, human? And then the element of monstrosity.  When do you change human > animal > monstrous?  These are all questions we have to know, for ourselves and each other.  These are the questions that define us morally – not by governing law, or political party, but by our own hearts beating a centimeter below our rib cage but loud enough to hear in the dark.

What I’m saying is: keep reading.  Torres fulfills the prophecy, the cliff hangers.  He doesn’t come out in full disclosure of what happens behind the closed doors, but he tells us what a face looks like in grief, how to carry a woman as she yells “no,” over the shoulder, hips against bicep, feet above head, arms trailing back.  He tells us the cause, but not the effect.

At the end we’re left asking: how?  And yet, it’s all there from the very first word.  Read again.  Explore the devastation.

17 thoughts on “Last Lines | We the Animals

    • Cassie says:

      I think I did enjoy – not sure how I will feel in a few days though. I’m still stewing it over. It’s definitely something to read, just for reading sake.

  1. ClaireMcA says:

    Great review. Some books don’t leave enough to the readers imagination and then some require you to make giant leaps, I prefer not to have it all spelled out, but reading your review shows how mind stretching that can be too. Brain yoga. Impressed that he manages all that in such a slim volume.

    • Cassie says:

      I was impressed too. I’m just still trying to figure out if the end is some cheap way to wrap it up or if he was planning it from the very beginning and to do that, I have to read it over again. I’m just not sure how I’ll feel about this book in a week. And I don’t like it spelled out either. A girl in my memoir class last night said, “no one likes epiphanies” and I think that’s true, haha.

  2. alenamurguia says:

    This book has been on my “To Read” since it was published. Your review has inspired me to move it toward the top. Endings are the hardest thing for writers to do well. I’ll get back to you…

    • Cassie says:

      Oh, I’m glad. You’ll have to tell me how you like it. I’ve been reading a lot of mixed reviews. Some people feel like the ending was cheap. I’m still stewing on it.

      • cricketmuse says:

        Done! Congrats on your reading goal. Maybe you’ll find some reads on my older posts. As I will no doubt grab some inspirations from yours!
        Happy Pages,

      • cricketmuse says:

        I just finished Pamela Aiden’s Darcy of Pemberley’s series, which is fan fiction, yet it could be a stand alone. I’m rereading Pride and Prejudice for a comparison. So far I’d say she captured the essence of Darcy well. I also recommend Divergent by Veronica Roth, which fulfilled my Hunger Games void.
        I’m on Good Reads, as well. I’m a screaming out loud book junkie! And love to shout it out!!
        Happy Pages,

  3. valerierlawson says:

    fascinating review. i think any story that you can’t stop mulling over – and in fact want to read again – and makes you think about it so much after you’re finished has to be worth the time to read.


Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s