Tag Archives: fiction

Newsday Tuesday

DSC_09732

Favorite Tweets:

Screen shot 2013-05-21 at 6.14.21 PM Screen shot 2013-05-21 at 6.14.38 PM Screen shot 2013-05-21 at 6.14.47 PM Screen shot 2013-05-21 at 6.15.02 PM Screen shot 2013-05-21 at 6.17.11 PM Screen shot 2013-05-21 at 6.18.29 PM Screen shot 2013-05-21 at 6.20.31 PM Screen shot 2013-05-21 at 6.20.54 PM Screen shot 2013-05-21 at 6.23.38 PM

Favorite Search Terms:

  • why is there a comma after 84, in 84, charing cross road?: Someones been hiding their inner grammarian.
  • pictures of bowel movements and what they mean: Is this like those websites that tell you what your dreams mean?  I’d rather just read my horoscope at Onion.  (Nobody really understands you like your husband does, except maybe for every single American who’s ever read a copy of Atlas Shrugged).  If I was married, it would be more than true.  Check yours out here.
  • pacific crest trail and sexy woman: I wonder if someone who met Cheryl Strayed on the trail is using the google machine.
  • tattoo kafka: Please tell me it’s a giant beetle.

Book News:


This is Not a Nice Review.

The Unchangeable Spots of Leopards by Kristopher Jansma

I abhor this book.  The only reason abhor isn’t in capitals is because I want you to know the quiet rage I feel towards the man who wrote this and the pretentious, gimmicky nonsense that this book became by the end.  If you don’t want to read a review filled with spewing rants, please just stop reading now.

The only reason another human being should pick up this book is to see a book within a book, or as an April Fool’s joke.  Give this one to someone you detest and tell them to live like the princess.  This is every experimental novel gone wrong.  You should not take me on a journey to every country under the sun just because your narrator can’t figure out who he is.   The travel throughout this book wasn’t justified at all.  It’s as if the author needed a reason to move this lonely boy throughout the world.

He must have thought, Hm, I’d like to write about Dubai, let me take him there next.  I know, he’ll have a student who offers him a delightful teaching professorship.  No, just no, Kristopher Jansma.  I know I’m a literature snob, and I loathed Goon Squad which everyone and their mother, including the Pulitzer committee adored, but seriously, is this what fiction is coming to?  Should I expect books that have no follow-through in the narrative.   Are there not expectations that a book has a solid cause and effect cycle even if I don’t agree with the cause and effect of it all (i.e. Harry Potter living in the final book)?  In Goon Squad, forty pages of powerpoint is not writing, that’s called forty pages of a powerpoint presentation, something I do infrequently for my students and I don’t want an author to do to me.  In The Unchangeable Spots of Leopards, two-hundred pages of just-so-so literary development isn’t enough to enhance the dangling characters.

While the characters are interesting and I find them somewhat tempting to read about it, they are filled with potholes of cliche. Puddles of cliche.  Mind-bombs of cliche.  Of course, Anton is a complete brown recluse of a writer hiding out in Iceland typing away a novel without any punctuation.  Until our author can quit a love that was never there to begin with, he can’t write his novel.  Why at the end, do we have to tie it all up with a nice little bow?  This boy from Airport Wing A writing a novel about all the experiences he has traveling on flights that his mother was once a hostess and inevitably used as a method to meet men and make her son.  I get the full circle, it didn’t need to be shoved in my face.  I also really didn’t appreciate the gimmick of having the book we’re reading be the book that the editor finds at the end and obviously publishes.  Whoever on Goodreads said this was such a new way of doing things, where have you been? Authors have been doing this for ages.  The book begins and ends and we discover, oh gee, that the book we’re reading was the book he was writing.  I wasn’t born yesterday, Jansma.

Of course, the unnamed main character finds his dream at the end and leaves it on the very table where he began the tale of losing his novels.  I wasn’t aware we needed that lovely little bow tied up at the end of our story.  I thought Eat, Pray, Love did enough of that.    Shoelace-perfect books are for girls who love when the princess falls for the prince and goes off into the sunset.  NOT for girls like me who think the princess has gone off to clean the kitchen of her throned prince.  We aren’t told what the princess does after marriage because of this: we make our own ideas, as readers, we’re a reliable sort.  We learn to read between the cracks that the author left.   In literary fiction, we don’t like these bows.  We want the gore and the pain and the raw affirmation that life is poetic, but hard as shit.

So… I’m sorry I’m the only one that feels this way, but absolutely not.  You may not gimmick your way into the literary folds of this universe.  I don’t care how many experiments you play on your reader, how many countries you don’t describe but somehow we end up in, or how many depressing conversations and drugs your characters take, I will never appreciate a book that can’t even take itself seriously.  How do you expect me to suspend relief through continents, narrative lines that are drug out, but never truly meaningful, and relationships that are painfully fake.  You can’t possibly expect me to just accept and hang on these experiments and cliches, right?

I am disappointed, sir.

Story of my life. Not for this book.

Side Note: The lovely and wonderful people at Penguin sent me this book as an advanced reader’s copy.  I will say that this is the first ARC I really did not adore by Penguin.  They usually send me fantastic literary ditties. I will never write a review just to get more advanced reader’s copies or to please the people at the top.  You will always get my most pure and honest thoughts.  It remains your choice whether you read this one or not and this is the opinion of a young adult woman who read this book while being rained-in on a camping trip.  Goodreads features other opinions here.

GIVEAWAY! The lovely people at Penguin also gave me the opportunity to have my first giveaway on my blog.  In honor of the new paperback cover of Glow by Jessica Maria Tuccelli, one of my readers will receive a free copy.  *SCREAMS OF GLEE*

To win the free copy, you must find a poem that uses the word “glow.”   I want to highlight some poetry for National Poetry Month.  The first reader to do this will win the free copy from Penguin.  Now, go on a poetry hunt!


It’s the Jr. that makes me wonder if this is real or fictional.

Flimsy Little Plastic Miracles by Ron Currie, Jr.

This book is like Courtney Love and Kurt Cobain’s relationship.  When it’s good, it’s grand, when it’s bad, it’s awful.  I think every girl wants to be Emma in Flimsy Little Plastic Miracles by Ron Currie, Jr. (Thank you, Penguin for the advanced reader’s copy).   She’s the woman that the main character desperately and blindly loves for the entirety of his life.  No matter what young coed happens to pop into his life on a drunken night, what island he moves to, or what desert village he finds himself in halfway through the book, he’s still in love with Emma.  In fact, he’s so in love with Emma, we get 352 pages about Emma.

If you’re into love stories that aren’t always “happily-ever after” and are more the real-life played-out dramas that feature, then here it is. WARNING | GENERALITY: I think every woman has Emma tendencies.  People hold on to those first loves when they’re young enough to doodle that person’s name in flowery script along the edges of their college ruled.  What girl didn’t write, “Mrs. Edward Cullen,” “Mrs. Fitzwilliam Darcy,” “Mrs. Heathcliff (unknowable first name).”  I’ve never known a guy who talked about his first love in too-nice of words, but Ron seems to have a heart about him.

The part I found the most connection with though was when Ron discussed his father.  I thought these parts of the story were particularly moving and really captured the essence of a family in turmoil over a devastating disease.  I’ve never been close to a family member who had cancer, but I can find myself becoming obsessed with the body of it.  When my grandmother had her stroke, I would find myself staring at her skin.  I always wanted to write out her skin, the purple bruises and the webbed veins.  As a child, you know veins as shadows under skin, but when you see them rise to the surface like expensive and painful lace, it’s hard to disregard the illness.  I knew what it meant to have a stroke because I could look at my grandmother and see the way her body was becoming inside-out.  We use these metaphors to make connections between what we already know and what we have yet to discover.   There’s only one way to feel something and that’s to feel it, but the next best thing is to see it and try to gather something from the swell.

Ron Currie, Jr’s other book & makes sense here on the blog.

However, what did bother me about this book was the post-modern novel narrator.  Can we get over this: “am I the author or the narrator” thing soon?  Why does it matter?  If you write the memoir, write the memoir as if it were incredibly good fiction and not your actual life.  OR on the other hand, write the fiction as if this was some person’s incredibly interesting life.  Do we really have to play the game of “Is Emma real” and “Does Ron Currie, Jr. the character actually love a girl in ‘real-life’ named Emma?”  Excuse me if I say that fiction is my real-life people, they blur more than occasionally.  I understand Ron (which is also my father’s name) was trying to write this book as if it’s the third Emma book in a string of two and therefore a series of books on one woman in her mid-life that is making one man in his mid-life a little insane.

Singularity. It’s amazing what you can find on the internet. Everything in this book about the singularity was in a real book by someone else.

I mean, the guy ends up moving to a shack beside the Red Sea.  The Red Sea to me is some distant sea on a map that makes me imagine a sea of blood.  I can’t help myself.  I know it should be more than that as I am American and America likes to dirty their hands with countries and businesses that are not ours and also because that is a predominant oil region and I drive an unfortunately oil-mannered car.  Honestly, it was at this point in the novel when my suspension as a reader was totally corrupted.  What man moves to the Red Sea (without ruining any of the plot for you) over a woman?  Is this why this is fiction?  Now albeit, my best friend did move to New Zealand for a guy, but everyone at the time, thought she was insane.  Maybe this is just the fate of all people who move for love and heartbreak to foreign places?

This post is making me look like a bigot.

While researching, I did find this Nat Geo on the sister seas of Saudi Arabia.  Exquisite!

This Red Sea business isn’t even the half of it.

The Hurwitz Singularity by Jonty Hurwitz

The worst part of this book and I mean epically bad is this “singularity” business.  We’re all going to become machines, making Dolly look like a quack scientist’s work.  The “singularity” will be this period of time when people are finally able to not be bound by their body, but instead by their mind.  I really enjoyed making the connection between the singularity and his father.  I think it’s really interesting for me to think about my grandmother’s stroke as if she had a stroke of the mind (which she obviously did) and what it would be like for me if her body wasn’t touched by the stroke, just her speech.  However, it interrupted the flow of the narrative.  This was not a science fiction story and I understand that Ron Currie, Jr. has been someone who writes about the after-life, but it took me completely out of the novel when I was reading these small insights of extra-terrestrial futuristic advice and longing.

Maybe this is just a book that’s ahead of itself.  (Or maybe I just need to get better at science fiction).

Now, this is not to say that I don’t recommend this book.  I’m more than mildly obsessed with the fact that the publisher accepted the book with so much white space.  I wish Currie took his white space a bit more seriously, but there’s 352 pages that could have easily been 160.  I also really liked the fact that this was a social commentary on the love story down to the author/narrator juxtaposition.

Be Your Best Self

He says, “And I was no better.  Like everybody else, I had trembled my whole life for something true.  I had hidden, and called it living” (270).  I think this is the real fruit of the book.  We are all living these lives dreaming that we’re something else, or someone else.

Joe B., the NC Poet Laureate came to speak to my classes today, he was wonderful.  He said something really poignant though, I thought.  He said to my students, “when you’re listening to those words through your headphones and all these words coming at you everyday, do you ever say to yourself, ‘I have some words to say.’ And if you do, what are those words?”  My students all wrote down three words against their will, just like they do when I ask them to write something and they make guttural noises and turn their necks into their desks like cranes.  But then they spoke these secret dreams they have, “no more poverty, more justice, fame, more girls, etc.”  And Joe B said to them, “This is your best self.  This is the good you that you hide away and dream.”


Newsday Tuesday

DSC_09732

Favorite Tweets:

Screen shot 2013-01-15 at 7.09.26 PM Screen shot 2013-01-15 at 7.09.40 PM Screen shot 2013-01-15 at 7.09.48 PM Screen shot 2013-01-15 at 7.10.11 PM Screen shot 2013-01-15 at 7.10.27 PM Screen shot 2013-01-15 at 7.11.09 PM Screen shot 2013-01-15 at 7.12.33 PM

Favorite Search Terms:

  • leave a letter library book: I will be finding out the story behind this and probably blogging about it.
  • light skin girls with booty: I’m proud to say this found my blog.  What does that say about me?
  • 5.39.41: Date or Shortened Dewey Decimal

Book News:


Newsday Tuesday

Favorite Tweets:

Favorite Search Terms:

  • If I wanted the government in my womb: I’d suck down the whole thing, all three branches; judicial, executive, legislative. (See I listened in High School US History).
  • tracy k. smith poetry excerpts: Her Poem, “Interrogative
  • yellow bedroom anis comforter: somehow this search term managed to confuse me into Anais Nin being connected to The Yellow Wallpaper.  It’s early, no coffee yet.
  • cat lady comic book: IS THIS TRUE!?
  • what do owls symbolize in hoot: horror. Just FYI, on my mom’s bucket list is, “see an owl in the wild.”  Exact quote, “I only ever see them in zoos.”  They’re also nocturnal so it’s going to be hard to get this one going.
  • raven bird in my basement: Go Poe on that Raven.

Book News:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • This is white space.  Fill it in with ferns of wild imagination.

Newsday Tuesday

Favorite Tweets:

Favorite Search Terms:

  • bfg roald dahl monopoly: WHAT! WHERE!  Would the pieces be “BoneCruncher,” GizzardGulper,” and MeatDripper.”  And what about the places: SnozzCumbers Country, FrobScottle Stage, Phizzwizard Land.  How wonderful.
  • man in holden caulfield winter hat: I feel like this is a want-ad on Craigslist (pre-Craigslist-killer era).  Look on e-harmony, hipsters really like to look like Holden Caulfield.
  • cassie hunter gives a boy a terrible clanging: I’m just glad that there are powerful Cassie’s out there.
  • books with “bird” in the title: Ah, so there are others like me.
  • two birds were sitting on a barbwire fence and one had a typewriter and one was eating food, the one said pass the salt: this is a literal google.  (google as verb).  Someone has too much time on their hands.

Book News:

Letters of Note has a letter from Sendek’s editor to a librarian who burned In the Night Kitchen.  Here is Sendek’s obituary in the NY Times and his interview with Fresh Air (NPR) in December.  The wonderful thing about Maurice Sendek is that he was always humble about his art, which makes him even more of a legend.  Thank you Tea & Paper for sharing these links.

Lastly; if you are a follower of this blog from NC, please vote today.  I would particularly like you to vote AGAINST Amendment 1 – The Marriage Amendment because NO ONE should suffer, or be treated unfairly, under the freedom of the US.  If anything, do your research.


84, Charing Cross Road | The story that successfully uses a comma in the title.

“you leave me sitting here writing long margin notes in library books that don’t belong to me, some day they’ll find out i did it and take my library card away.”

Thanks, Katie dear.

During my letter writing month, Claire kept suggesting I read 84, Charing Cross Road.  I don’t usually enjoy books written in letter form, but in this case, it’s a true story of a woman writing letters to a bookshop (and its many characters, mainly Frank Doel).  I think I can get on the bus for a book of letters that is really about books, which inevitably makes it a book about books.  Perks of Being a Wallflower kind of failed that test.  I never even got through The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society (sigh).

I felt so much like myself reading these letters, as if it had suddenly appeared in the library stacks and eeked out of its glossy plastic cover and asked me to dance.

While most of the times I find small bits of camaraderie with characters in the folds of the pages I read, in this book I felt utter completeness with Helene, as if I was her only in a new life where I could skype my way into British bookstores and buy the Doel’s nylons at the grocery.

Helene is a character you love from the first page – she’s both pushy, and darling.  I particularly loved when she typed in all caps to show her hurried excitement, or sarcasm.  In every way, I felt like this could be a woman who shared a piece of soul with me as if a soul can be broken and misplaced, or borrowed.

Interrupters, worse than tax collectors in Shakespeare’s day.

Earlier today, Swamplandia left a small post-it note on its cover for me, and I imagine Claire’s push for me to read this book was much like this post-it note.  It’s as if she knew I would perfectly relate.

84, Charing Cross Road is a book you read aloud.  Depending on your mood, and your attitude, you will read it aloud in a British accent.  (You may even drink tea, pinky up).  I was lucky enough to read most of it in the closed off space of a car (pity I wasn’t going through a car wash at the time, I do so love to read, and dance during the car wash.  See, the accent is already taking over my typing).  Either way, I am always moving my lips while I read.  I hardly move my teeth at all, but even as I type this I am making out the words with my lips.  It’s slight, mostly upper lip, and it usually keeps interrupters away because they know you’re clearly busy having a conversation with a paperback.  That soft hiss of spit at the corner of your mouth when you’re moving your lips so fast because you can’t wait to read what happens next, that’s when you know, you’ve successfully scared them all away.

Reading the correspondence between Helen Hanff and the bookish few of 84, Charing Cross Road was like reading into a past life.   I like to believe bookish people automatically have old souls.  Bookish people have been through so much in their four-thousand past lives that they can really appreciate the quiet of words, the soft sweep of turned pages, the pencil smudges in the margins.  It’s the little things I suppose.  A small history can be drudged up from just a highlighted page, or a note reading, “here, happy,” or “gender notions.”  I like to think bookish people are also passive aggressive which leads to a lot of angry notes shoved under bedroom doors.  (I think my mother can attest to my being this way, especially from ages 13 to 16).

I don’t know anyone with a love of books who shouldn’t read 84, Charing Cross Road.  Helene’s love of books is undeniable and she writes Mark & Co. staff during a time when everything is unreasonable.  There are rations on all kinds of foods in England, especially eggs and meats.  Imagine a life without cake, and yet, the bright spot in every person’s life is this bookstore that lives through food droughts, wars, deaths, and in the end, closes before Hanff can ever get into its doors to smell the dust, and myrrh of antiquarian books. (We had to get Biblical in order to really understand that smell).

84 Charing Cross Road, Marks & Co.

There’s so many things to love in just 97 pages.  Side note: I love books that end on an odd number, solely because I think it takes someone unafraid of superstation to pull this off.

After recently reading Jillian’s blog at A Room of One’s Own I’ve been thinking about my own mark on things here in the book blogger stratosphere.  She discusses her stance as a book blogger and her stance on recommendations about books.  She holds to the statement that she would rather not be considered some sort of “elite reader” that people follow.  I have to be honest and tell you that I follow Jillian because I can’t really stand many of the Classics and she seems to inspire (in me) a reason to search through their coy pages.

Anywho, while reading 84, I was touched by how much Helene’s love of books really inspires the reader to form bonds with characters.  I was ready to jump into John Donne and visit the cobblestones of Oxford. (I’m not even sure there are cobblestones, I’m just fantasizing).   I think without even meaning to Helene has inspired a large group of people to read again.

And this is my question: isn’t that what we’re all doing here?  Obviously, part of my blog is to impart my own unique tastes, and statements onto the world, but it’s also to convince people to plunge into books rather than facebook, or Law & Order.  I write this blog because I want to inspire people to scribble their secrets into that small half-inch of space between paragraph and page end.  When Helene discusses this quote:

“I wish you hadn’t been so over-courteous about putting the inscription on a card instead of on the flyleaf.  It’s the bookseller coming out in you all, you were afraid you’d decrease its value.  You would have increased it for the present owner.  (And possibly for the future owner.  I love inscriptions on flyleaves and notes in margins, I like the comradely sense of turning pages someone else turned, and reading passages some one long gone has called my attention to.)”

84, Charing Cross Road by Helene Hanff

I find myself pencilling into my diary the page number, and wanting to go home and permanent marker my name into the top of every book on my shelf.  It is so like me to hoard books, but maybe I need to caress them, pencil them, and send them off into the world again.  When I come to a book with a page turned over I find myself wondering if the page was turned in haste; if their bus stop came up abruptly because they were so completely lost in the fantasy, or if later they planned on copying the sentence into their journals.  I copy sentences into a journal so that I never really mark up a book, but why is that?  Why don’t I share with the world where I found my most intimate moments with these characters, my most intimate moments with myself.

This is a bit of a jumbled mess, but I think as a book blogger I do dedicate myself to books and in that way I dedicate myself to words, and readers, and sharing, and margin notes, and dog-earred triangle flaps, and the statements I put out there about the books I read.  In a way I always feel personally indebted to these books that I just want to hold in my fists and breathe in like a child’s soft head.  I’m not sure how I can remove myself from my opinions and the opinions I sometimes force on this blog.  As a reader of my blog you have to realize that the push of my opinions is from the physical thaw I feel after reading a story that literally changes me in some way.   I either miss myself, or push myself, or feel myself again after a long withdrawal.

Visit Vincenzorizzo’s etsy page (by clicking this image) to see his other prints. They’re amazing.

On this blog I share books that make me remember myself, and make me expect difference, or expect change.  84 Charing Cross Road is easily one of these books.  If nothing else it inspired me to write more letters, and read more books.  Isn’t that the only thing we can ask from books and from book bloggers, that they inspire the sense of reading, that they inspire us to live in two worlds; one of reality and one of fiction.  Countless people have said that writers are good liars, but what’s to say that readers aren’t, we are always living double lives.

This blog is very much – a girl on the page, and a girl walking about the world.


“…No More a Boy than a Fish with Wings.” – Kate Walbert

The Gardens of Kyoto - Kate Walbert

Swoon.  Sigh.  Let me dust my cheek with my handkerchief and lean my palm against my chin.  My elbow against this balcony.  My eyes against the green stems of the Gardens of Kyoto.  If you can picture this, my bottom lip is out, plush, my hair huffed up with each breath.  This story was a doozy, it makes me want to be a romantic in a dainty cloth dress.  The Gardens of Kyoto spans years of wars, men going insane, or sad.  It spans gardens, Philadelphia, dark slave rooms filled with walls of scratched numbers, mansions, and sisters.  How can you span sisters without spanning generations, without explaining they’re like their mother or their father.  You read Gardens of Kyoto and you see sisters, their span of lives, their similarities and differences.  I love the confusion of sisters, the “why does she do it this way when it’s so clear our duty is this.”

This is a sad book.  Nobody is happy in the end, well Daphne, but Daphne is such a flower name that you can’t make her outcomes ugly.  (NOBODY WON THE PULITZER IN FICTION).

The Pulitzer

*EXCUSE ME WHILE I RANT AND THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE DISAGREE WITH MY OPINION:  The reason no one won the Pulitzer this year, in my humble blogging opinion, is that the art of fiction in America needs to do better.  We are in an age where people are selling e-books and e-stories for pennies and people are self-publishing due to various reasons (some that they can’t find a publisher who will take their story).  Let’s not forget Harry Potter was discarded by numerous publisher’s before a humble small publishing house finally accepted it for publication.  We need to remember it isn’t always in the name.  All of the people up for Pulitzer’s this year had made a name in contemporary fiction.  Does a name mean that the book you published, the trees you killed for that paper, were worth it?  We just need to ask ourselves this before we publish our books.  If I’m going to buy a hardcover, I expect that the book is as good as its binding.

I’m not saying any of the books up for this years Pulitzer Prize were bad (I haven’t read them), I’m just saying that maybe it’s a sign for American fiction.  We need to stay true to our spirit.  Just because a book is outlandish, does not mean it’s wonderful.  Just because your last name is Wallace, does not mean everything you write will turn to gold.  I do love some Denis Johnson though, he gets me every time.  I will read this new novella even though it was not awarded.

I hope the publishing world starts looking for writers in the humblest of places.  We all have a story, but we don’t all want to write it down.  Do you trust publishing houses to tell you what’s wonderful in fiction?  Or do you ever wonder if something great is out there that you’ll never read because it’s been turned down too many times, and the writer is now stuffing it into a drawer, folding a twine string around the parchment, or leaving it to collect dust, for their children to find after their death.  I wonder…I often wonder.

Thank you, Pulitzer committee for making us scared again.  What is writing if not fear?  Fear that we won’t have time to tell our stories.  Fear that these characters will die and disappear.  Fear that the people won’t love you, that the words won’t be beautifully strung together like a back home Christmas wreath on your dying mother’s door.  Fear is what writing is.  Be memorable.

*END RANT.

Gardens of Kyoto is a lovely book if you don’t mind being unhappy for a few days.  The words are beautiful, Kate Walbert has a way of saying something with a choir of bodies that makes you want to scream, bury your face in a pillow and shove the book into the sleeve of the pillow case to dream about later.  I’m especially bias about this book because I have this sick fantasy about being a girl someone writes letters home too.  I think I was meant to be born in the thirty’s, when my father was born.  I was meant to feel a sliver of the depression and then send someone off into the clutches of battlefields, dead trees, winter.

Maybe that’s why I especially love books written from the narration of war widows, or war girlfriends, girls who’ve been pinned and are always waiting.  I have this ideal of running down the dust road to the mail box, missing the pot holes slick with mud from yesterday’s rain.  And while Ellen doesn’t ever get to do this, she does have men who belong to her, but belong more to the war.  Men who gave her a small piece of themselves, but took the rest to be closed and trampled.

I think that’s the thing I loved most of the book, the small pieces of human.  Every character gave Ellen a small bit of themselves.  Her child, who she writes too, gave her the smell of fresh skin, of babies, a murmur.  Her cousin Randall, gave her a goodbye – his hands pressed to the round parts of her face.  Her mother gave her nothing but quiet, to mourn.  Sterling gave her a view of history.  Everyone gave her something of themselves, something of history.  Isn’t that the way though, we will never truly know someone because we won’t know their thoughts.

Southern Belle

In my head, I talk in a southern accent.  I have to be careful it doesn’t come out in my real life but I like to decorate the words, round them, drawl out my conversations with myself.  It’s strange the way we have these small secrets with ourselves.  It must be the reason our imagination is at its best in the night, just before sleep, when we are the most ourself – the most alone with these bodies.

Clearly, mine is a body lying in the sweat of the South.  And yours…


Newsday Tuesday:

Click this photo to go to my nominee page

I have some fun things to share for April 10th.  First, go without shoes tomorrow for TOMS’ One Day Without Shoes.  They can say it better than me so check it out to the right. The other thing is the Goodread’s Book Blogger Award.  I really wasn’t going to enter myself in this because I do not have the luck of my Irish ancestors, but I would love to go to the book convention and take my mother on a trip to NY.  If you like this blog, please just take the time to vote for me.  I will go as low as putting cherries on top to earn your vote.

And now for the usual:

Favorite Tweets

Favorite Search Terms

  • The big sleep bookstore: sounds like a store in Sleepy Hollow.  Maybe I should hibernate there in the winter instead of wearing scarves, turning red, and shivering.
  • “blog” tights: I need these.  I commenced in googling until I found any reference to blogging on a pair of tights.  I’m pretty positive that they don’t quite exist yet – blogging tights, or blogging leggings, in case you’re wondering.  What we need are “blogging is sexy” tees.  Yum.
  • poems about liking a boy: Aren’t you cute.  Look up Romeo and Juliet, buy a dagger.
  • why is carolyn forche a good poet: WHOAREYOU.  And you can’t capitalize a name (even in a google search).  You’re hearby kicked off this blogging island.  Banned.  Banished. Exiled. Removed by deadly force.
  • wwjd bracelet font:  One thing you don’t know about me… since I was fourteen I’ve worn a WWJD bracelet on my left wrist.  When one breaks, I immediately run out to the Family Christian Store and get a new one.  I used to have a rainbow one – it was my gay pride Jesus bracelet, now I just have black.  I like the person who googled this, they get me.
  • my rabbit’s ears are gleam:  poet?

Book News:

If you’re new to my blog, I’m obsessed with Alice.  There really only is one Alice, so I can’t really elaborate.  I need to go to bed.

Christopher Lee reads Lewis Carroll’s “Jabberwocky.”


Mint Green and Sparkles

Fingaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Instead of blogging … I’ve been painting my nails mint green with sparkles.  Not because that’s festive for the season but just because I found a bottle of sparkles on my sister-in-laws antique table and decided sparkles go well with mint.  Yes, it’s safe to say I’ve headed back a few years to my pre-teen stage, my acne will testify to this in front of the judge.  All four large, and spewing pimples that are appearing at, or around my chin.  Other things I’ve been doing: Trying to take my midterm which my teacher refuses to put up on a day that actually works with my schedule.  Figuring out how long I’m going to work with Parks & Recreation (hopefully forever & ever and ever so I can be that old lady that watched like eight generations of teens grow up and out of her center, while carrying around uncountable cats in my purses, pockets, and large floral dresses).   Lastly, playing with my nephew who keeps telling me I have poop on my face (with corn driblets) although I don’t…and don’t plan to unless my life goes completely non-sensical.

As you can tell, I’ve been festering.

I haven’t read any good books lately, I’m at a crossroads with my writing where I’m really trying to pursue one or the other; poetry or fiction (or non-fiction).  I’ve been reading some amazing non-fiction lately from various literary magazines (Granta, Creative Non-Fiction, Ploughshares) and I’m starting to think that’s where I’d like to stomp around for a bit (in the tantrum sense of the word stomp), but do I really want to be another twenty-three-year-old who tries to beef up her ex-boyfriend stories for publication?  And if I don’t, do I want to be that twenty-three-year-old that just gets on a greyhound and hopes for a cross-country diner and a blue and white petticoat apron for a story?  I’m just not sure.  I’m really leaning towards writing fiction since all my poems have become long narrative pieces that really should have been focused more to the fiction arena, yet here I am writing random lines of poetry in the shower, on the toilet, in those early morning cracked eye moments of pre-made bed bliss…

Does a girl always have to make a choice?  I mean we already have to make decisions about every other crucial thing in our lives (and then boys come into the picture and we have to make their decisions as well, believe you me…it’s true there is always a powerful woman behind every well-groomed, and well-dressed man you see).  Just this morning, my dad was trying to convince me through news articles on google why I need to switch birth controls.  The question really should be: why are there so many birth control choices (including a shot, and who really wants more of those) and why do you have to choose between bleeding every month as nature says, or not bleeding every month and being a much happier lady (but maybe in twenty years your vagina rots and dies)?  (Just some random thoughts).

My friend Nat wrote a bit about this earlier today (including her monologue on the State Fair and it’s many fried coma-inducers, yum!) but otherwise she’s getting ready to escape into the world of November Nanowrimo.  Unfortunately for myself, I’m definitely not ready for that kind of challenge, nor am I ready to envelope myself in a novel – and since I know that about myself, I’m not even daring to try.  (One day though, one day when I have a functional child’s play shed in the backyard filled with rows of Roald Dahl books and one good copy of Jayne Anne Phillips Lark & Termite, I’ll be ready).  By the way, if you haven’t read Lark & Termite, you are a blasphemous sinner.  I’ll know when I’m ready – now is most certainly not the time.  But Nat is, (God Bless her) and she’s trying to decide how to make her novel function. I think the best advice I’ve ever read on this…ever…in my whole worldly existence is from Lorrie Moore.

The advice is linked here (and should be read by anyone who reads my blog so they can not only heed the advice, but know me a bit better because I feel like this is a story about myself…literally – except switch child psychology with religious studies).

Actually rather than link it…I’m just going to copy and paste the whole thing because I can’t rely on you people to actually click & read.  I know I hardly ever click & read, I just politely whipser to myself how nice that little blog was and move on with my to-do list.  So here goes:


Lorrie Moore
on the Writer’s Life
HOW TO BECOME A WRITER     by Lorrie Moore
*
First, try to be something, anything, else.  A movie star/astronaut.  A movie star missionary.  A movie star/kindergarten teacher.  President of the World.  Fail miserably.  It is best if you fail at an early age — say, fourteen.  Early, critical disillusionment is necessary so that at fifteen you can write long haiku sequences about thwarted desire.  It is a pond, a cherry blossom, a wind brushing against sparrow wing leaving for mountain.  Count the syllables. Show it to your mom.  She is touch and practical.  She has a son in Vietnam and a husband who may be having an affair.  She believes in wearing brown because it hides spots.  She’ll look briefly at your writing, then back up at you with a face blank as a donut.  She’ll say: “How about emptying the dishwasher?”  Look away.  Shove the forks in the fork drawer.  Accidentally break one of the freebie gas station glasses.  This is the required pain and suffering.  This is only for starters.
*
In your high school English class look only at Mr. Killian’s face.  Decide faces are important.  Write a villanelle about pores.  Struggle.  Write a sonnet.  County the syllables:  nine, ten, eleven, thirteen.  Decide to experiment with fiction.  Here you don’t have to count syllables.  Write a short story about an elderly man and woman who accidentally shoot each other in the head, the result of an inexplicable malfunction of a shotgun which appears mysteriously in their living room one night.  Give it to Mr. Killian as your final project.  When you get it back, he has written on it:  ”Some of your images are quite nice, but you have no sense of plot.”  When you are home, in the privacy of your own room, faintly crawl in pencil beneath his black-inked comments:  ”Plots are for dead people, pore-face.  
*
Take all the babysitting jobs you can get.  You are great with kids.  They love you.  You tell them stories about old people who die idiot deaths.  You sing them songs like “Blue Bells of Scotland,” which is their favorite.  And when they are in their pajamas and have finally stopped pinching each other, when they are fast asleep, you read every sex manual in the house, and wonder how on earth anyone could ever do those things with someone they truly loved.  Fall asleep in a chair reading Mr. McMurphy’s Playboy.   When the McMurphys come home, they will tap you on the shoulder, look at the magazine in your lap, and grin.  You will want to die.  They will ask you if Tracey took her medicine all right.  Explain, yes, she did, that you promised her a story if she would take it like a big girl and that seemed to work out just fine.  ”Oh, marvelous” they will exclaim.
*
Try to smile proudly.
*
Apply to college as a child psychology major.
*
As a child psychology major, you have some electives.  You’ve always liked birds.  Sign up for something called, “The Ornithological Field Trip.”  It meets Tuesdays and Thursdays at two. When you arrive at Room 134 on the first day of class, everyone is sitting around a seminar table talking about metaphors.  You’ve heard of these.  After a short, excruciating while, raise
your hand and say diffidently, “Excuse me, isn’t this Birdwatching One-oh-one?”  The class tops and turns to look at you.  They seem to have one face — giant and blank as a vandalized clock.  Someone with a beard booms out, “No, this is Creative Writing.”  Say:  ”Oh — right,” as if perhaps you knew all along.  Look down at your schedule.  Wonder how the hell you ended up here.  The computer, apparently, has made an error.  You start to get up to leave and then don’t.  The lines at the reistrar this week are huge.  Perhaps your creative writing isn’t all that bad.  Perhaps it is fate.  Perhaps this is what your dad meant when he said, “It’s the age of computers, Francie, it’s the age of computers.
*
Decide that you like college life.  In your dorm you meet many nice people.  Some are smarter than you.  And some, you notice, are dumber than you. You will continue, unfortunately, to view the world in exactly these terms for the rest of your life.  The assignment this week in creative writing is to narrate a violent happening. Turn in a story about driving with your Uncle Gordon and another one about two old people who are accidentally electrocuted when they go to turn on a badly wired desk lamp. The teacher will hand them back to you with comments: ”Much of your writing is smooth and energetic. You have, however, a ludicrous notion of plot.” Write another story about a man and a woman who, in the very first paragraph, have their lower torsos accidentally blitzed away by dynamite. In the second paragraph, with the insurance money, they buy a frozen yogurt stand together. There are six more paragraphs. You read the whole thing out loud in class. No one likes it. They say your sense of plot is outrageous and incompetent. After class someone asks you if you are crazy.

*

Decide that perhaps you should stick to comedies. Start dating someone who is funny, someone who has what in high school you called a ”really great sense of humor” and what now your creative writing class calls ”self-contempt giving rise to comic form.” Write down all of his jokes, but don’t tell him you are doing this. Make up anagrams of his old girlfriend’s name and name all of your socially handicapped characters with them. Tell him his old girlfriend is in all of your stories and then watch how funny he can be, see what a really great sense of humor he can have.

*

Your child psychology adviser tells you you are neglecting courses in your major. What you spend the most time on should be what you’re majoring in. Say yes, you understand.

*

In creative writing seminars over the next two years, everyone continues to smoke cigarettes and ask the same things: ”But does it work?” ”Why should we care about this character?” ”Have you earned this cliche?” These seem like important questions.  On days when it is your turn, you look at the class hopefully as they scour your mimeographs for a plot. They look back up at you, drag deeply and then smile in a sweet sort of way.

*

You spend too much time slouched and demoralized. Your boyfriend suggests bicycling.  Your roommate suggests a new boyfriend. You are said to be self-mutilating and losing weight, but you continue writing. The only happiness you have is writing something new, in the middle of the night, armpits damp, heart pounding, something no one has yet seen. You have only those brief, fragile, untested moments of exhilaration when you know: you are a genius.  Understand what you must do. Switch majors. The kids in your nursery project will be disappointed, but you have a calling, an urge, a delusion, an unfortunate habit. You have, as your mother would say, fallen in with a bad crowd.

*
Why write? Where does writing come from? These are questions to ask yourself. They are like: Where does dust come from? Or: Why is there war? Or: If there’s a God, then why is my brother now a cripple?
*
These are questions that you keep in your wallet, like calling cards. These are questions, your creative writing teacher says, that are good to address in your journals but rarely in your fiction.  The writing professor this fall is stressing the Power of the Imagination. Which means he doesn’t want long descriptive stories about your camping trip last July. He wants you to start in a realistic context but then to alter it. Like recombinant DNA. He wants you to let your imagination sail, to let it grow big-bellied in the wind. This is a quote from Shakespeare.
*
Tell your roommate your great idea, your great exercise of imaginative power: a transformation of Melville to contemporary life. It will be about monomania and the fish-eat-fish world of life insurance in Rochester, N.Y. The first line will be ”Call me Fishmeal,” and it will feature a menopausal suburban husband named Richard, who because he is so depressed all the time is called ”Mopey Dick” by his witty wife Elaine. Say to your roommate: ”Mopey Dick, get it?”  Your roommate looks at you, her face blank as a large Kleenex. She comes up to you, like a buddy, and puts an arm around your burdened shoulders. ”Listen, Francie,” she says, slow as speech therapy. ”Let’s go out and get a big beer.
*
The seminar doesn’t like this one either. You suspect they are beginning to feel sorry for you. They say: ”You have to think about what is happening. Where is the story here?”

*

The next semester the writing professor is obsessed with writing from personal experience. You must write from what you know, from what has happened to you. He wants deaths, he wants camping trips. Think about what has happened to you. In three years there have been three things: you lost your virginity; your parents got divorced; and your brother came home from a forest 10 miles from the Cambodian border with only half a thigh, a permanent smirk nestled into one corner of his mouth.  About the first you write: ”It created a new space, which hurt and cried in a voice that wasn’t mine, ‘I’m not the same anymore, but I’ll be O.K.’ ”

*
About the second you write an elaborate story of an old married couple who stumble upon an unknown land mine in their kitchen and accidentally blow themselves up. You call it: ”For Better or for Liverwurst.”
*
About the last you write nothing. There are no words for this. Your typewriter hums. You can find no words.
*
At undergraduate cocktail parties, people say, ”Oh, you write? What do you write about?”  Your roommate, who has consumed too much wine, too little cheese and no crackers at all, blurts: ”Oh, my god, she always writes about her dumb boyfriend.”
*
Later on in life you will learn that writers are merely open, helpless texts with no real understanding of what they have written and therefore must half-believe anything and everything that is said of them. You, however, have not yet reached this stage of literary criticism. You stiffen and say, ”I do not,” the same way you said it when someone in the fourth grade accused you of really liking oboe lessons and your parents really weren’t just making you take them.
*
Insist you are not very interested in any one subject at all, that you are interested in the music of language, that you are interested in – in – syllables, because they are the atoms of poetry, the cells of the mind, the breath of the soul. Begin to feel woozy. Stare into your plastic wine cup.
*
”Syllables?” you will hear someone ask, voice trailing off, as they glide slowly toward the reassuring white of the dip.
*
Begin to wonder what you do write about. Or if you have anything to say. Or if there even is such a thing as a thing to say. Limit these thoughts to no more than 10 minutes a day, like sit- ups, they can make you thin.
*
You will read somewhere that all writing has to do with one’s genitals. Don’t dwell on this. It will make you nervous.
*
Your mother will come visit you. She will look at the circles under your eyes and hand you a brown book with a brown briefcase on the cover. It is entitled: ”How to Become a Business Executive.” She has also brought the ”Names for Baby” encyclopedia you asked for; one of your characters, the aging clown-schoolteacher, needs a new name. Your mother will shake her head and say: ”Francie, Francie, remember when you were going to be a child psychology major?”
Say: ”Mom, I like to write.”
She’ll say: ”Sure you like to write. Of course. Sure you like to write.
*
Write a story about a confused music student and title it: ”Schubert Was the One with the Glasses, Right?” It’s not a big hit, although your roommate likes the part where the two violinists accidentally blow themselves up in a recital room. ”I went out with a violinist once,” she says, snapping her gum.
*
Thank god you are taking other courses. You can find sanctuary in 19th-century ontological snags and invertebrate courting rituals. Certain globular mollusks have what is called ”Sex by the Arm.” The male octopus, for instance, loses the end of one arm when placing it inside the female body during intercourse. Marine biologists call it ”Seven Heaven.” Be glad you know these things. Be glad you are not just a writer. Apply to law school.

*

From here on in, many things can happen. But the main one will be this: You decide not to go to law school after all, and, instead, you spend a good, big chunk of your adult life telling people how you decided not to go to law school after all. Somehow you end up writing again.  Perhaps you go to graduate school. Perhaps you work odd jobs and take writing courses at night. Perhaps you are working and writing down all the clever remarks and intimate personal confessions you hear during the day. Perhaps you are losing your pals, your acquaintances, your balance.

*
You have broken up with your boyfriend. You now go out with men who, instead of whispering ”I love you,” shout: ”Do it to me, baby.” This is good for your writing.
*
Sooner or later you have a finished manuscript more or less. People look at it in a vaguely troubled sort of way and say, ”I’ll bet becoming a writer was always a fantasy of yours, wasn’t it?” Your lips dry to salt. Say that of all the fantasies possible in the world, you can’t imagine being a writer even making the top 20. Tell them you were going to be a child psychology major.  ”I bet,” they always sigh, ”you’d be great with kids.” Scowl fiercely. Tell them you’re a walking blade.
*
Quit classes. Quit jobs. Cash in old savings bonds. Now you have time like warts on your hands. Slowly copy all of your friends’ addresses into a new address book.  Vacuum. Chew cough drops. Keep a folder full of fragments.
*
An eyelid darkening sideways.
World as conspiracy.
Possible plot? A woman gets on a bus.
Suppose you threw a love affair and nobody came.
*
*
At home drink a lot of coffee. At Howard Johnson’s order the cole slaw. Consider how it looks like the soggy confetti of a map: where you’ve been, where you’re going – ”You Are Here,” says the red star on the back of the menu.
*
Occasionally a date with a face blank as a sheet of paper asks you whether writers often become discouraged. Say that sometimes they do and sometimes they do. Say it’s a lot like having polio.  ”Interesting,” smiles your date, and then he looks down at his arm hairs and starts to smooth them, all, always, in the same direction.From ”Self-Help,” a collection of short stories by Lorrie Moore.
*
Copyright 1985 by M. L. Moore.Lorrie Moore was born in Glen Falls, New York on January 13, 1957. She attended St Lawrence University in Canton, New York, from 1974 to 1978 receiving a BA and graduating summa cum laude.  She attended Cornell University in Ithaca, New York, from 1980 to 1982 receiving an MFA. She is currently Professor of  English at the University of Wisconsin at Madison where she also lives with her husband and son.

*

Lorrie Moore has been the recipient of the National Endowment for the Arts award in 1989, the Rockefeller Foundation fellowship in 1989, and the Guggenheim fellowship in 1991. Her work frequently appears in Fiction International, Ms, The New York Times Book Review, Paris Review, The New Yorker, and others.

*

Her publications include: Self-Help (1985); Anagrams (1986); The Forgotten Helper (1987); Like Life (1990); editor, I Know Some Things: Stories About Childhood by Contemporary Writers (1992); Who Will Run the Frog Hospital? (1994) and Birds of America (1998).  

*

Interview with Lorrie Moore in NY Magazine.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 913 other followers

%d bloggers like this: